One of our contributors, Skye, has given up Internet time in order to apply herself diligently to the praying of many Rosaries for the intentions of this latest, and defiantly "greatest" of all the SSPX's Rosary Crusades.
I must admit, I have been some what lax in this regard, but the issues at stake here are much more important.
Watch this video, it will surely inspire you to offer all your free time to this noble Crusade!
http://www.gloria.tv/?media=28126
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Television: The Greatest Tool of the Freemasons
Television: The Freemason’s Greatest Achievement
By Skye Dolphin
Every guilty American knows that the more television he watches out of laziness or boredom, the more unhealthy he becomes. His brain begins to dull as his body begins to soften strangely, growing in size and blubber. However, how many viewers of television know the darker, more subtle effect of television: the complete corruption of the soul caused by spiritual apathy? The enemies of the Catholic Church, especially the Freemasons, have used the television to project messages of relaxed morality and anti-Catholicism.
Father Peter R. Scott of the SSPX clarifies why television viewing is dangerous:
It is equally obvious, and every traditional Catholic will admit it, that the regular watching of television for children is an occasion of sin, and this not just because of the obvious sins of impurity, but especially of materialism, concupiscence of the eyes, the loss of the Faith and the perversion of the mind by the parading of the false ideals of subjectivism and liberalism continually before the eyes of the young.
Many children have grown up on television. The television has replaced quality family time. When the child is unpleased with something in his environment, he cries, trying to gain the attention of his mother or father. In times before television, either the parents would scold him for his angry temper or would comfort him or maybe even play a game with him. However, in these most modern times, the parents will simply do the easy thing: they will set the child before the television screen, which instantly captures his attention and renders him senseless for as long as he is captivated by the bright, flashing images before him. The parents are satisfied; no work had to be done. The child is satisfied; whatever was bothering him before is completely forgotten.
2
As Father Scott has written, it is an occasion of sin to expose one’s self to the evil messages of the television. And to deliberately expose one’s self to an occasion of sin is actually a sin. So every time one watches the television, he is sinning. And if the occasion of sin is mortal, the viewing itself becomes a mortal sin. But the viewing of television is not only sinful because of the perverted ideals, the materialism, the liberalism and the subtle anti-Catholic messages; it is sinful because it is an addiction to laziness; it is no more than a poisonous drug, the opiate of the masses. The more one watches television, the more one begins to crave it more. When someone is watching television, he is watching millions of tiny, tiny images that a constantly flashing, so that his brain must put the images together to form one, unified image. In order to do this, the brain enters a state called the “alpha” state, in which the left side becomes completely inactive, in a zombie-like mode of consciousness. The left side of the brain is the logical, well-tempered, mathematical portion. Needless to say, television is probably the cause of today’s children’s inability to solve math problems without a calculator.
Because one needs not use his logical side of the brain while viewing television, he becomes incredibly relaxed and open to everything he hears and sees on the screen. He needs not do anything, he becomes no more than a beast, filling his belly, filling his mind with nothing but dust. He becomes completely passive, doing nothing but laying down, completely enthralled by what he is watching. In this state, any group (the government, the Freemasons, the Neo-Nazis) can inject into the world’s consciousness anything it wants to.
3
Watching the television dulls the mind and also opens the mind to sinful refuse such as immodesty and sexual abuses. The more and more one exposes himself to such negative views on Catholic morality, the more he begins to question his own morals and the more he becomes used to the evil morals of the world. He watches millions of women wearing tight jeans and low cut shirts and eventually begins to think this sinful style of dress is acceptable and commonplace. Women begin to think this way as well. They think that they must follow the trends of the modern era so that they will not “stick out” in a crowd or be the subject of someone’s ridicule. Soon enough, television has brainwashed every woman to wear immodest clothing because--it is simply the social rule.
Sex is also exploited on television. It seems that one cannot possibly watch a single sitcom these days without hearing a dirty reference to a sinful sexual relationship. “Typical teen fare contains heavy doses of sexual content, ranging from touching, kissing, jokes, and innuendo to conversations about sexual activity and portrayals of intercourse. Sex is often presented as a casual activity without risk or consequences. Conventional wisdom holds that the messages young viewers absorb from television promote sexual activity in this group” (Collins).
Marriage is also attacked fiercely. The role of the woman, as portrayed on most modern television shows, is that of either a single “mom,” the “boss” of the house or just a hard-working (outside of the house) wife. These women are considered heroes, no matter how morally relaxed they are. According to Saint Paul, a woman is not supposed to be a single “mom” or the head of the household, rather, she is to be meek and gentle, in submission to her husband at all times. “In like manner also let wives be subject to their
4
husbands: that if any believe not the word, they may be won without the word, by the conversation of the wives. Considering your chaste conversation with fear.”
Therefore, television should be eschewed by all Catholics. It is clearly an evil device that the Freemasons have manipulated to spread their evil values. Let us be the Church Militant, fighting ever valiantly against the evils of the world, including the most evil infection of modern times: the flashing box of sin!
By Skye Dolphin
Every guilty American knows that the more television he watches out of laziness or boredom, the more unhealthy he becomes. His brain begins to dull as his body begins to soften strangely, growing in size and blubber. However, how many viewers of television know the darker, more subtle effect of television: the complete corruption of the soul caused by spiritual apathy? The enemies of the Catholic Church, especially the Freemasons, have used the television to project messages of relaxed morality and anti-Catholicism.
Father Peter R. Scott of the SSPX clarifies why television viewing is dangerous:
It is equally obvious, and every traditional Catholic will admit it, that the regular watching of television for children is an occasion of sin, and this not just because of the obvious sins of impurity, but especially of materialism, concupiscence of the eyes, the loss of the Faith and the perversion of the mind by the parading of the false ideals of subjectivism and liberalism continually before the eyes of the young.
Many children have grown up on television. The television has replaced quality family time. When the child is unpleased with something in his environment, he cries, trying to gain the attention of his mother or father. In times before television, either the parents would scold him for his angry temper or would comfort him or maybe even play a game with him. However, in these most modern times, the parents will simply do the easy thing: they will set the child before the television screen, which instantly captures his attention and renders him senseless for as long as he is captivated by the bright, flashing images before him. The parents are satisfied; no work had to be done. The child is satisfied; whatever was bothering him before is completely forgotten.
2
As Father Scott has written, it is an occasion of sin to expose one’s self to the evil messages of the television. And to deliberately expose one’s self to an occasion of sin is actually a sin. So every time one watches the television, he is sinning. And if the occasion of sin is mortal, the viewing itself becomes a mortal sin. But the viewing of television is not only sinful because of the perverted ideals, the materialism, the liberalism and the subtle anti-Catholic messages; it is sinful because it is an addiction to laziness; it is no more than a poisonous drug, the opiate of the masses. The more one watches television, the more one begins to crave it more. When someone is watching television, he is watching millions of tiny, tiny images that a constantly flashing, so that his brain must put the images together to form one, unified image. In order to do this, the brain enters a state called the “alpha” state, in which the left side becomes completely inactive, in a zombie-like mode of consciousness. The left side of the brain is the logical, well-tempered, mathematical portion. Needless to say, television is probably the cause of today’s children’s inability to solve math problems without a calculator.
Because one needs not use his logical side of the brain while viewing television, he becomes incredibly relaxed and open to everything he hears and sees on the screen. He needs not do anything, he becomes no more than a beast, filling his belly, filling his mind with nothing but dust. He becomes completely passive, doing nothing but laying down, completely enthralled by what he is watching. In this state, any group (the government, the Freemasons, the Neo-Nazis) can inject into the world’s consciousness anything it wants to.
3
Watching the television dulls the mind and also opens the mind to sinful refuse such as immodesty and sexual abuses. The more and more one exposes himself to such negative views on Catholic morality, the more he begins to question his own morals and the more he becomes used to the evil morals of the world. He watches millions of women wearing tight jeans and low cut shirts and eventually begins to think this sinful style of dress is acceptable and commonplace. Women begin to think this way as well. They think that they must follow the trends of the modern era so that they will not “stick out” in a crowd or be the subject of someone’s ridicule. Soon enough, television has brainwashed every woman to wear immodest clothing because--it is simply the social rule.
Sex is also exploited on television. It seems that one cannot possibly watch a single sitcom these days without hearing a dirty reference to a sinful sexual relationship. “Typical teen fare contains heavy doses of sexual content, ranging from touching, kissing, jokes, and innuendo to conversations about sexual activity and portrayals of intercourse. Sex is often presented as a casual activity without risk or consequences. Conventional wisdom holds that the messages young viewers absorb from television promote sexual activity in this group” (Collins).
Marriage is also attacked fiercely. The role of the woman, as portrayed on most modern television shows, is that of either a single “mom,” the “boss” of the house or just a hard-working (outside of the house) wife. These women are considered heroes, no matter how morally relaxed they are. According to Saint Paul, a woman is not supposed to be a single “mom” or the head of the household, rather, she is to be meek and gentle, in submission to her husband at all times. “In like manner also let wives be subject to their
4
husbands: that if any believe not the word, they may be won without the word, by the conversation of the wives. Considering your chaste conversation with fear.”
Therefore, television should be eschewed by all Catholics. It is clearly an evil device that the Freemasons have manipulated to spread their evil values. Let us be the Church Militant, fighting ever valiantly against the evils of the world, including the most evil infection of modern times: the flashing box of sin!
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Luther, Exposing the Myth
LUTHER-AS HE WAS
(Death Mask by Lucas Fortnagel – Leipzig, University Library)*
“Among you there will be lying teachers who will bring in destructive sects . . . And many will follow their wanton conduct, and because of them the way of truth will be maligned.” - II Peter 2:1-2
By Fr. Raymond Taouk
Luther speaks for himself;
With the New Movie on Luther having recently come out I think it would be good to get a real insight to the true Character of Luther and expose “legend” of “Luther Reformer”. Luther is undoubtedly the father of the Protestant rebellion and spiritual father of the Modern Apostasy from God. The object of this article on Martin Luther is not to give his history, which is easily researched, but rather to give direct quotes from a man called a “great religious reformer” and to whom many non-Catholics trace back real origin of their respective churches.
Who will doubt that the best judge of Luther’s true character is Luther himself? And so from Luther’s own words we shall see him for what he really was, that is a rebellious apostate, who abandoned the faith and led many into apostasy from God under the guise of “reformation” in order to follow his perverse inclinations.[1] Keeping in mind that none of the following statements of Luther, which I will quote, were ever retracted by him, and so they may still be considered as part of his “religious thought”. This should show the aspect of Martin Luther which Protestants and all alike so conveniently overlooked in these days of false ecumenism and intellectual dishonesty.
With the New Movie on Luther having recently come out I think it would be good to get a real insight to the true Character of Luther and expose “legend” of “Luther Reformer”. Luther is undoubtedly the father of the Protestant rebellion and spiritual father of the Modern Apostasy from God. The object of this article on Martin Luther is not to give his history, which is easily researched, but rather to give direct quotes from a man called a “great religious reformer” and to whom many non-Catholics trace back real origin of their respective churches.
Who will doubt that the best judge of Luther’s true character is Luther himself? And so from Luther’s own words we shall see him for what he really was, that is a rebellious apostate, who abandoned the faith and led many into apostasy from God under the guise of “reformation” in order to follow his perverse inclinations.[1] Keeping in mind that none of the following statements of Luther, which I will quote, were ever retracted by him, and so they may still be considered as part of his “religious thought”. This should show the aspect of Martin Luther which Protestants and all alike so conveniently overlooked in these days of false ecumenism and intellectual dishonesty.
The Commandments
Christ taught: “If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.”[2]
Luther in speaking of the commandments teaches: "Their only purpose is to show man his impotence to do good and to teach him to despair of himself"[3]
“Thou shalt not covet,’ is a commandment which proves us all to be sinners; since it is not in man’s power not to covet, and the same is the drift of all the commandments, for they are all equally impossible to us.”
"Moses is an executioner, a cruel lictor, a torturer a torturer who tears our flesh out with pincers and makes us suffer martyrdom . . . Whoever, in the name of Christ, terrifies and troubles consciences, is not the messenger of Christ, but of the devil . . . Let us therefore send Moses packing and for ever." [4]
“We must remove the Decalogue out of sight and heart” (De Wette 4, 188).
“If we allow them - the Commandments - any influence in our conscience, they become the cloak of all evil, heresies and blasphemies” (Comm. ad Galat, p.310).
What is more is that scripture constantly declares the greatness of the commandments and the importance of keeping them:
Ps. 19 :7 : “The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul; the decrees of the Lord are sure, making wise the simple; the precepts of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the Lord is clear, enlightening the eyes.”
FREE WILL
Christ taught: “Not every one who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” [6]
Luther teaches: "...with regard to God, and in all that bears on salvation or damnation, (man) has no 'free-will', but is a captive, prisoner and bond slave, either to the will of God, or to the will of Satan."[7]
"...we do everything of necessity and nothing by 'free-will'; for the power of 'free-will' is nil..."[8]
"Man is like a horse. Does God leap into the saddle? The horse is obedient and accommodates itself to every movement of the rider and goes whither he wills it. Does God throw down the reins? Then Satan leaps upon the back of the animal, which bends, goes and submits to the spurs and caprices of its new rider... Therefore, necessity, not free will, is the controlling principle of our conduct. God is the author of what is evil as well as of what is good, and, as He bestows happiness on those who merit it not, so also does He damn others who deserve not their fate." [9]
“His (Judas) will was the work of God; God by His almighty power moved his will as He does all that is in this world.”[10]
On Reason
Christ taught: “ Be therefore, wise as serpents and simple as doves”[11]
“You know then how to discern the face of the sky: and can you not know the signs of the times?”[12]
Luther teaches: “No good work happens as the result of one’s own wisdom; but everything must happen in a stupor . . . Reason must be left behind for it is the enemy of faith.” [13]
“Reason is the devils handmaid and does nothing but blaspheme and dishonor all that God says or does.” [14]
“Reason is directly opposed to faith, and one ought to let it be; in believers it should be killed and buried.”[15]
“One should learn Philosophy only as one learns witchcraft, that is to destroy it; as one finds out about errors, in order to refute them”[16]
On Sin
Christ taught: “He that commits sin is of the devil: for the devil sinned from the beginning. For this purpose, the Son of God appeared that He might destroy the works of the devil.” - 1 John 3:8
Luther teaches: “A person that is baptized cannot, thou he would, lose his salvation by any sins however grievous, unless he refuses to believe. For no sins can damn him but unbelief alone.”[17]
Luther teaches: “A person that is baptized cannot, thou he would, lose his salvation by any sins however grievous, unless he refuses to believe. For no sins can damn him but unbelief alone.”[17]
"Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides... No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day."[18]
"Do not ask anything of your conscience; and if it speaks, do not listen to it; if it insists, stifle it, amuse yourself; if necessary, commit some good big sin, in order to drive it away. Conscience is the voice of Satan, and it is necessary always to do just the contrary of what Satan wishes." [19]
Faith and Good works
Christ taught: “Let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your father who is in heaven.”[20]
Christ taught (in the words of St. James) “What shall it profit, my brethren, if a he has faith, but has not works? Shall faith be able to save him? So faith also, if it have not works is dead in itself.”[21]
Luther teaches: “For we account a man to be justified by faith alone, without the works of the law.” – On Translation and on the Intercession of the Saints
Christ taught (in the words of St. James) “What shall it profit, my brethren, if a he has faith, but has not works? Shall faith be able to save him? So faith also, if it have not works is dead in itself.”[21]
Luther teaches: “For we account a man to be justified by faith alone, without the works of the law.” – On Translation and on the Intercession of the Saints
“There is no scandal greater, more dangerous, more venomous, than a good outward life, manifested by good works and a pious mode of life. That is the grand portal, the highway that leads to damnation." [24]
Social Justice
Christ taught: “Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice: for they shall have their fill.”[26]
Luther teaches [27]: “Peasants are no better than straw. They will not hear the word and they are without sense; therefore they must be compelled to hear the crack of the whip and the whiz of bullets and it is only what they deserve.” [28]
“To kill a peasant is not murder; it is helping to extinguish the conflagration. Let there be no half measures! Crush them! Cut their throats! Transfix them. Leave no stone unturned! To kill a peasant is to destroy a mad dog!” – “If they say that I am very hard and merciless, mercy be damned. Let whoever can stab, strangle, and kill them like mad dogs”[29]
“I, Martin Luther, have during the rebellion slain al the peasants, for it was I who ordered them to be struck dead. All their blood is upon my head. But I put it all on our Lord God: for he commanded me to speak thus.”[30]
“God has given the law, and nobody observes it. He has in addition instituted rod masters, drivers and urgers; so then are rulers to drive, beat, choke, hang, burn, behead, and break upon the well of the vulgar masses.”[31]
“Like the drivers of donkeys, who have to belabor the donkeys incessantly with rods and whips, or they will not obey, so must the ruler do with the people; they must drive, beat throttle, hang, burn, behead and torture, so as to make themselves feared and to keep the people in check”[32]
“Wherever the princes take their power from, it does not regard us. It is the will of God, irrespective whether they have stolen their power or assumed it by robbery”[33]
The Jews
Christ taught: “You shall love your neighbour as yourself.”-Matt 22:39
Luther teaches: "My advice, as I said earlier, is: First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire... Second, that all their books-- their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-- be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted...Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country...Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it...
Luther teaches: "My advice, as I said earlier, is: First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire... Second, that all their books-- their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-- be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted...Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country...Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it...
He who hears this name [God] from a Jew must inform the authorities, or else throw sow dung at him when he sees him and chase him away".[34]
"Burn their synagogues. Forbid them all that I have mentioned above. Force them to work and treat them with every kind of severity, as Moses did in the desert and slew three thousand... If that is no use, we must drive them away like mad dogs, in order that we may not be partakers of their abominable blasphemy and of all their vices, and in order that we may not deserve the anger of God and be damned with them. I have done my duty. Let everyone see how he does his. I am excused."[35]
“ If I had to baptize a Jew, I would take him to the bridge of the Elbe, hang a stone round his neck and push him over with the words I baptize thee in the name of Abraham”[36]
Marriage and Women
Christ taught: “For this reason shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they shall be in one flesh. Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder. . . Moses by reason of the hardness of your heart permitted you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, commits adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, commits adultery.”[38]
Luther teaches: “If the husband is unwilling, there is another who is; if the wife is unwilling, then let the maid come.”[39]
“Suppose I should counsel the wife of an impotent man, with his consent, to giver herself to another, say her husband’s brother, but to keep this marriage secret and to ascribe the children to the so-called putative father. The question is: Is such a women in a saved state? I answer, certainly.”[40]
“Know that Marriage is an outward material thing like any other secular business. The body has nothing to do with God. In this respect one can never sin against God, but only against one’s neighbour.”[42]
“As to divorce, it is still a debatable question whether it is allowable. For my part I prefer bigamy to it.”[43]
“The word and work of God is quite clear, viz., that women are made to be either wives or prostitutes.”[44]
“In spite of all the good I say of married life, I will not grant so much to nature as to admit that there is no sin in it. .. no conjugal due is ever rendered without sin. The matrimonial duty is never performed without sin.”[45]
Virtue and Vice
On Lying:
Christ taught: “You are of your father the devil: and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning: and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.”[46]
Luther teaches: “What harm could it do if a man told a good lusty lie in a worthy cause and for the sake of the Christian Churches?”[47]
“To lie in a case of necessity or for convenience or in excuse – such lying would not be against God; He was ready to take such lies on Himself”[48]
On God:
Christ taught: “You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind. This is the greatest and the first commandment.”[49]
Luther teaches: “I look upon God no better than a scoundrel”[50]
On Drunkenness:
Christ Taught (in the words of St. Paul): “Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: Neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers: Nor the effeminate nor liars with mankind nor thieves nor covetous nor drunkards” [51]
Luther teaches: “We eat and drink to kill ourselves, we eat and rink up to our last farthing.”[52]
On Pride:
Christ taught: “And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be humbled” [53]
Luther teaches: “St. Augustine or St. Ambrosius cannot be compared with me.”[54]
“What I teach and write remains true even though the whole world should fall to pieces over it” [55]
On the Person of Christ
Christ taught: “Which of you shall convince Me of sin? If I say the truth to you, why do not believe Me? He that is of God, hears the words of God. Therefore you hear them not, because you are not of God.”[56]
Luther teaches: “Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tell’s us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.”[57]
“I have greater confidence in my wife and my pupils than I have in Christ”[58]
“It does not matter how Christ behaved – what He taught is all that matters”[59]
Sacred Scripture
Christ taught: " For I testify to every one that hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book.”[60]
Luther teaches: "to my mind it (the book of the Apocalypse) bears upon it no marks of an apostolic or prophetic character... Everyone may form his own judgment of this book; as for myself, I feel an aversion to it, and to me this is sufficient reason for rejecting it."[61]
"If your Papist annoys you with the word ('alone' - Rom. 3:28), tell him straightway, Dr. Martin Luther will have it so: Papist and ass are one and the same thing. Whoever will not have my translation, let him give it the go-by: the devil's thanks to him who censures it without my will and knowledge. Luther will have it so, and he is a doctor above all the doctors in Popedom."[62]
Luther had a perverse habit of freely falsifying scripture to justify his purposes.
"The history of Jonah is so monstrous that it is absolutely incredible."[63]
"The history of Jonah is so monstrous that it is absolutely incredible."[63]
"The book of Esther I toss into the Elbe. I am such an enemy to the book of Esther that I wish it did not exist, for it Judaizes too much and has in it a great deal of heathenish foolishness."[64]
"...the epistle of St. James is an epistle full of straw, because it contains nothing evangelical."[66]
It is worth noting that while Luther claimed for himself the right to interpret scripture according to his own view, and claimed that he was intelligent enough to judge anyone and everything by scripture alone yet he openly affirms that "We cannot claim to fathom completely the meaning of a single verse of Scripture; we succeed in apprehending only the A B C of it, and even that imperfectly." - Luther, Table-talk, trans. Gustave Brunet, Paris, Garnier, 1844, pg. 288.
It is worth noting that while Luther claimed for himself the right to interpret scripture according to his own view, and claimed that he was intelligent enough to judge anyone and everything by scripture alone yet he openly affirms that "We cannot claim to fathom completely the meaning of a single verse of Scripture; we succeed in apprehending only the A B C of it, and even that imperfectly." - Luther, Table-talk, trans. Gustave Brunet, Paris, Garnier, 1844, pg. 288.
And again he states: "Let no one believe himself competent to understand Holy Scripture, unless he has, for a hundred years, governed the Church with the Prophets, with Elijiah and Elisha, St. John the Baptist, Jesus Christ and the Apostles." -Luther, Table-talk, trans. Gustave Brunet, Paris, Garnier, 1844, pg. 290.
Conclusion:
While I leave to the reader to draw his own conclusions, it suffices to say that what Luther really was; and the picture that is presented of him today by modern scholars, Lutherans and Protestants alike is far from the truth. Given this fact, it’s not difficult to see how a nation like Germany was able to blindly follow a person like Hitler if it had previously so readily embrace a person like Luther.[67] Adolf Hitler himself was indeed no doubt a true (spiritual) son of Luther and in many ways was only being logical to the principles set forth by Luther in his approach to things[68]. Hitler himself declared the reality of this point in one of his speeches saying: “I do insist on the certainty that sooner or later – once we hold power – Christianity will be overcome and the German Church established. Yes, the German church, without a Pope and without the bible, and Luther, if he could be with us, would give us his blessing.”[69]
What is more is that from Luther’s own words (which I have stated above) we are able to grasp the origin of the inversion of orders in modern society, which we see has prevailed in the modern world. Luther ushered in this new era of apostasy from God in his attempt to rationalize his own perversity and make of it the foundations for civil society. The erroneous principles upon which the modern world is based undeniably come from Luther himself and can never be reconciled to the teachings of the Gospel no matter what Luther might have thought.
* The death mask as depicted above is the same as found in the book by the well known philosopher Jacques Maritain in his book "Three Reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau" London: Sheed and Ward, 1950.
- N.B. Erlangen and Weimar refer to the different editions of Luther’s works. Luther’s literary work is very voluminous (the critical edition of Weimar, commenced in 1883, comprises many volumes), and is not easily found in libraries but when not having quoted from the original sources I have quoted from those authors who have draw from the original sources.
[1] As Luther himself stated “I am but a man prone to let himself be swept off his feet by Society, Drunkenness, the torments of the flesh.” – Weimar, Vol. 9, Pg. 215, Pg. 13. On another occasion, he states: “I burn with all the desires of my unconquered flesh” – Enders Vol. 3, Pg. 189.
[3] Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), Volume III, p. 364.
[4] D. Martini Lutheri Exegetica Opera Latina, published by Elsperger (Erlangen, Heyder, 1829-84), Vol. 18 pg. 146
[7] From the essay, 'Bondage of the Will,' 'Martin Luther: Selections From His Writings, ed. by Dillenberger, Anchor Books, 1962 p. 190.
[9] 'De Servo Arbitrio', 7, 113 seq., quoted by O'Hare, in 'The Facts About Luther, TAN Books, 1987, pp. 266-267.
[15] Erlangen, Vol. 44, Pg. 156-157. For more quotes in this regard see: “Three Reformers”, By Jacques Maritan, Pg. 34 ; Cf. also Jean Janssen, L’Allemagne et la Reforme. (Trans. E. Paris, Plon, 1887-1911), Vol VII, pg 427.
[16] Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Fol. (1516). Ficker, II, 198. Cf. Three Reformers, By Jacques Maritan, Pg. 31
[17] The Babylonian Captivity. It’s worth mentioning on this point that Luther himself had early written “Pray for me I am falling into the abyss of Sin” – Enders, Vol. 3, Pg. 193.
[18] 'Let Your Sins Be Strong, from 'The Wittenberg Project;' 'The Wartburg Segment', translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther's Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. - Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404).
[19] J. Dollinger, La Reforme et les resultants qu’elle a produits. (Trans. E. Perrot, Paris, Gaume, 1848-49), Vol III, pg. 248
[20] Matt 5:16, Cf. Apoc 20:12, Gal 6:2, 1 Jn 3:18, Jas 4:17, I Cor 13:2, II Peter 1:10, Gal 6:9. There are also many warnings in scripture that warn against falling away from salvation (Gal 4:9, Col 1:23, 1 Tim 1:19, 4:1, Heb 3:12-14, 12:14-15, 2 Pet 2:20-21, Apoc 2:4-5).
[23] Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. III, pg. 47.
[24] Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 128.
[27] It is important to keep in mind that these peasants were actually Protestants who favoured Luther and his views, yet in order to please the German princes Luther and gain influence Luther did not hesitate to have even his own followers put to death! As one writer put it “I know of no example in history ( with the exception of Hitler’s famous, or rather infamous, June 30, 1934) where a man turned in such an inhuman, brutal, low way against his own followers – merely in order to establish his own position, without any reason.” – Peter F. Winer, Martin Luther, Hitler’s Spiritual Ancestor, Pg. 57
[34] Martin Luther; On the Jews and Their Lies, translated by Martin H. Bertram, Fortress Press, 1955
[35] About the Jews and Their Lies,' quoted by O'Hare, in 'The Facts About Luther, TAN Books, 1987, p. 290.
[45] Weimar, Vol 8. Pg. 654. In other words for Luther the matrimonial act is “a sin differing in nothing from adultery and fornication.” ibid. What then is the purpose of marriage for Luther you may ask? Luther affirms that it’s simply to satisfy one’s sexual cravings “The body asks for a women and must have it” or again “To marry is a remedy for fornication” – Grisar, “Luther”, vol. iv, pg. 145.
[52] Weimar, Vo. 9. pg. 215. We can also note on this point that the opinion of Luther’s contemporaries on the subject is unmistakable. They all agree that Luther “was addicted to over-drinking.” - Th. Brieger: “Aleander and Luther”, pg. 170, 307.
[57] Trishreden, Weimer Edition, Vol. 2, Pg. 107. - What a great blasphemy from a man who is regarded as “great reformer”!
[62] Amic. Discussion, 1, 127,'The Facts About Luther,' O'Hare, TAN Books, 1987, p. 201. Cf. Also J. Dollinger, La Reforme et les resultants qu’elle a produits. (Trans. E. Perrot, Paris, Gaume, 1848-49), Vol III, pg. 138.
[66] 'Preface to the New Testament,' ed. Dillenberger, p. 19. - Cf. Also Jean Janssen, L’Allemagne et la Reforme. (Trans. E. Paris, Plon, 1887-1911). Vol II, Pg. 218.
[67] Anyone who contends this point needs simply to read views of Luther concerning the state, civil authority and war. In his writings, we find that he openly states for example “Even if the authorities are wicked and unjust, nobody is entitled to oppose them, or to riot against them.” Or again “The ass must have blows and the People must be ruled by force. God knew this well, for it was not a fox’s brush He gave to rulers, but a sword.” - Weimar, Vol 30, Pg. 1. This point is dealt with in more detail by Peter F. Wiener in his work “Martin Luther, Hitler’s Spiritual Ancestor”, Published by Marian House, Powers Lake, N.D. 58773.
[68] This was undeniably recognized by the Lutherans who welcomed and supported the regime of Hitler. A point worth mentioning in this regard is that this fact is so blatantly ignored by Protestants and the Liberal media who at the same time do not hesitate to unjustly put forward attacks against Pope Pius XII and his efforts against the Nazis.
[69] Adolf Hitler, Hitler’s speeches, edited by Prof. N.H. Baynes [oxford, 1942], pg. 369.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)
